DOGE wants access to the data of millions of Americans, including Social Security numbers, medical information, tax return ...

WASHINGTON – A divided Supreme Court on June 6 said Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency can have complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security ...

The Supreme Court, on Friday, for now gave the DOGE team launched by Elon Musk unfettered access to information collected by the Social Security Administration, data that includes Social Security ...

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to access sensitive information kept by the Social Security ...

In its decision, the Supreme Court concluded the Social Security Administration may give DOGE access to agency records while the case plays out “in order for those members to do their work.” ...

The Supreme Court just ruled that Trump's Department of Government Efficiency can access your Social Security records.

The Supreme Court on Friday handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) two major victories in its expanding legal battle over drastic efforts to reshape the federal bureaucracy. In two ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories Friday in cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency, including giving it access to Social Security ...

The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration to grant DOGE access to sensitive Social Security data, overturning a Maryland judge’s order.

The Supreme Court has handed DOGE at least a temporary victory. The team can keep accessing information collected by the Social Security Administration, including medical and mental health records.

In its decision, the Supreme Court concluded the Social Security Administration may give DOGE access to agency records while the case plays out "in order for those members to do their work." ...

The Supreme Court Friday allowed DOGE broad access to Social Security data while legal challenges continue. All three liberal justices dissented, citing privacy concerns and lack of safeguards.