The Trump administration on Friday urged the Supreme Court to step into a years-old legal battle over a policy that bars immigration judges from expressing their personal views in public, a case that could have wider consequences for federal workers.

A bedrock legal doctrine called "stare decisis," Latin for "to stand by things decided," calls upon courts to respect their prior precedents when resolving new cases on similar matters. A basic tenet of U.S. law is that stare decisis promotes consistency and predictability in the law.

The US Supreme Court will decide whether the government made missteps when charging a former Twitter employee convicted of spying for Saudi Arabia.

Trump administration’s push to expand denaturalization confronts Supreme Court rulings strictly limiting citizenship revocation.

Chief Justice John Roberts has led the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on a steady march of increasing the power of the presidency

The New York Times Editorial Board has criticized the Supreme Court for failing to adequately restrain President Trump's overreach and preserve the balance of powers, citing numerous examples of lower courts blocking Trump's power grabs and the Supreme Court allowing them to proceed.

Updated on Dec. 5 at 8:58 a.m. The Supreme Court on Thursday gave the green light to Texas’ efforts to be able to use a new congressional map favorable to […]